Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Speed vs. mpg/mileage/fuel economy chart - Mirage 1.2L 5-spd and CVT

  1. #31
    "Shaking like crazy" = lugging.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Denmark
    Country
    Denmark
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    232
    Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Daox View Post
    Lugging is when it sends strong vibrations through to the chassis like you mention.
    ohh exactl I dont let my engine lug(rumble), for the shake is just because of the small engine, so the car's weight take over the engine and shake like on waves... I don't let it rumble/lug

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage Intense 1.2 manual: 47.9 mpg (US) ... 20.4 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.6 mpg (Imp)


  3. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Denmark
    Country
    Denmark
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    232
    Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    "Shaking like crazy" = lugging.
    no no no no no... I meant creazy shake like on waves due to small engine and heavy body. Feels like the car ride some waves from times to times when I start from standstill... But I shall just let the engine run smooth no rumbling, right? thanks

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage Intense 1.2 manual: 47.9 mpg (US) ... 20.4 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.6 mpg (Imp)


  4. #34
    Junior Member CESARG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    FL
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts

    Question

    It is very confusing, my engine's RPMs with a CVT on the highway doing like 65-70 mph are @ around 2100-2200 RPMs VS. like 3200 RPMs using a 5 speed equipped Mirage at the same speed..... There is no way that the stick shift is going to do better MPGs on 60+ MPH highway cruising with way more engine load....

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    287
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked 222 Times in 104 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CESARG View Post
    It is very confusing, my engine's RPMs with a CVT on the highway doing like 65-70 mph are @ around 2100-2200 RPMs VS. like 3200 RPMs using a 5 speed equipped Mirage at the same speed..... There is no way that the stick shift is going to do better MPGs on 60+ MPH highway cruising with way more engine load....
    I think the key is that engine RPM is not the same as engine load. Take this example: You're in gear (MT or CVT), downhill, off the gas, at 3,000 RPM, but using no fuel. This is (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) an example of DFCO (deceleration fuel cut off). The the potential energy becomes kinetic energy, transferred through the wheels and transmission to the engine, which would cause the pistons to move (without fuel being supplied).

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 44.1 mpg (US) ... 18.7 km/L ... 5.3 L/100 km ... 52.9 mpg (Imp)


  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    193
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 64 Times in 48 Posts
    I average 5.3L/100km on the highway at 120km/h. I do this 6 days a week for my 100km each way commute. My car has over 100,000kms on it, and I still average the same. It drops to 6.3L/100km with my winter tires on, however. All these measures are by my car's output.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 36.9 mpg (US) ... 15.7 km/L ... 6.4 L/100 km ... 44.3 mpg (Imp)


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Tyrelirwin For This Useful Post:

    MetroMPG (10-28-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •