^ not gonna lie, I like the name Cookiemonster
cookiemonster (01-15-2014)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2013 Mirage 1.0 manual: 47.5 mpg (US) ... 20.2 km/L ... 5.0 L/100 km ... 57.0 mpg (Imp)
I think more power tends to equal better fuel efficiency, in that it means that for every unit of gas used a greater proportion of the available energy is going to moving the piston - less wasted energy as no fuel can sneak by the piston rings. I could be way off on this, though.
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)
Break in at different speeds . Such as some city then state , county , town roads < 55 along with some interstate (65) . Then repeat until desired break in mileage is reached .
pardon me if i am incorrect but don't most car manufacturers run the engine in their own "DYNO" where they test for tolerances and flush out the initial oil before shipping the vehicle? i believe that makes the break in process relatively less meaningful than what it used to be.
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 54.7 mpg (US) ... 23.3 km/L ... 4.3 L/100 km ... 65.7 mpg (Imp)