Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Wikipedia's page for the Mirage / Space Star is not good

  1. #1
    Administrator MetroMPG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    1000 Islands, Ontario
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    6,279
    Thanks
    1,986
    Thanked 1,680 Times in 1,043 Posts

    Wikipedia's page for the Mirage / Space Star is not good



    Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubi...0.93present.29

    Whoever wrote the section called "Reception" about the current generation car decided to focus exclusively on the negative.

    The opening sentence is: "The Mirage was met with negative reviews in Europe and Australia."

    And it goes from there quoting the terrible Top Gear UK review.

    I think that opening sentence is factually incorrect - the car has had mixed reception/reviews (as do most vehicles). Furthermore, it seems the car's critical reception varies quite a bit from country to country. As it's written now, the page gives the incorrect impression the car has had universally bad reviews.

    Anybody here have experience editing Wikipedia? Considering how insanely popular Wiki is when people are searching for anything, that section is bad news. It's not balanced at all.


    Attached Images Attached Images  

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage base ES 1.2 manual: 54.0 mpg (US) ... 23.0 km/L ... 4.4 L/100 km ... 64.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #2
    Senior Member grsupercity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    817
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 69 Times in 56 Posts
    You can always edit wiki pages

  3. #3
    Administrator MetroMPG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    1000 Islands, Ontario
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    6,279
    Thanks
    1,986
    Thanked 1,680 Times in 1,043 Posts
    Ha - I was just on the page looking for global Mirage production numbers (didn't find any), and the car's wikipedia page is STILL not good.

    Anybody disagree that the first sentence in the "Reception" section for the G6 Mirage is very misleading?

    Opening that section with: "The Mirage was met with negative reviews in Europe, Australia, and North America" suggests that there was a concensus that the car was bad.

    But we know that's far from true:
    Thread: MYTH: car reviewers hate the Mirage


    And it's won a bunch of awards and recognition:

    Thread: Mirage / Space Star awards & accomplishments



    Anybody here have Wiki editing experience who can make revisions while coming across as dispassionate/informational (rather than fan-boyish, which will probably get any edits reversed)?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage base ES 1.2 manual: 54.0 mpg (US) ... 23.0 km/L ... 4.4 L/100 km ... 64.9 mpg (Imp)


  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    ab
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    655
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 410 Times in 227 Posts
    I was able to change it for a minute. They didn't think deleting most of the bad stuff was constructive so they reverted my changes

  5. #5
    Administrator MetroMPG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    1000 Islands, Ontario
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    6,279
    Thanks
    1,986
    Thanked 1,680 Times in 1,043 Posts
    Haha! Not surprised.

    That was fast though.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage base ES 1.2 manual: 54.0 mpg (US) ... 23.0 km/L ... 4.4 L/100 km ... 64.9 mpg (Imp)


  6. #6
    Senior Member IchabodCrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Thunder Bay, ON. CA
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    640
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 271 Times in 162 Posts
    Anyone who reads that far into the Wiki article would certainly keep reading through the bad stuff to where, as I read it the car is redeemed adequately.
    Will weld for beer.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 automatic: 45.3 mpg (US) ... 19.3 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.5 mpg (Imp)


  7. #7
    Senior Member mitsumi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Manila
    Country
    Philippines
    Posts
    793
    Thanks
    475
    Thanked 283 Times in 172 Posts
    there's an edit button on the default page but I don't know how to code

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...ge&action=edit

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage GLS 1.2 manual: 26.3 mpg (US) ... 11.2 km/L ... 8.9 L/100 km ... 31.6 mpg (Imp)


  8. #8
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio ☼
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,799
    Thanks
    2,509
    Thanked 948 Times in 708 Posts
    There are certain rules Wikipedia uses to try to enforce neutrality. It takes a bit of learning Wikipedia's ways, but editing according to their standards is possible.
    Welcome to MirageForum.com
    Forums work best when information is shared.
    And don't forget pictures.
    Mitsubishi Is Not Dead Yet

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.6 mpg (Imp)


  9. #9
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio ☼
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,799
    Thanks
    2,509
    Thanked 948 Times in 708 Posts
    Well, a few updates have been made to the 6th generation Reception section. Let me know what you think.
    Welcome to MirageForum.com
    Forums work best when information is shared.
    And don't forget pictures.
    Mitsubishi Is Not Dead Yet

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.6 mpg (Imp)


  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Niagara region
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    275
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 79 Times in 61 Posts
    I'll try later. I'm somewhat experienced with Wiki pages. Most of my revisions have stood the test of time.


    Zero, my 2014 ES Plus gone but not forgotten. We're driving the Beetle of the 21st century

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2017 Mirage ES PLus 1.2 manual: 39.0 mpg (US) ... 16.6 km/L ... 6.0 L/100 km ... 46.9 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •