Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Ford to drop mpg on fiesta

  1. #11
    Yes, I eco-drive. But the Mirage beats its ratings by a wider margin than other cars when driven in the same manner on the same route. That's why I think they were conservative with the ratings.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #12
    Senior Member Mikhail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    314
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 86 Times in 62 Posts
    The New numbers for Ford Fiesta EcoBoost are 31/43/36 instead of 32/45/37. The Mirage CVT is the most efficient non-hybrid car in all of these three ratings.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Mikhail For This Useful Post:

    MetroMPG (06-14-2014)

  4. #13
    Senior Member socal6g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ares View Post
    1. I don't think mitsu understating ratings in the US as I'm getting about the sticker-posted numbers. They just figured that not everyone will hypermill like y'all do.

    2. Ford's doing better at being 'proctive' than Government Motors.
    I actually think they have. You for example have wayyyy bigger rims and tires yet you are having the "same" mpg that they have stated on their stock car. Everytime i upgraded rims which was twice and changed the dimensions of the tire. I also was getting around 45-47 mpgs. When I had my stockies I was making easy 52mpgs. Then when I tried to be eco I was closer to 59

  5. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    US
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    22
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    It's a shame, Ford is probably the number one domestic and didn't need to do any of this false rating.

  6. #15
    Senior Member Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Houston
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,908
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 201 Times in 142 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by fusion210 View Post
    It's a shame, Ford is probably the number one domestic and didn't need to do any of this false rating.

    They are number one in truck sales at least.

    Ford is great at only two things I think:
    Trucks and mustangs.

    I probably won't buy any other.

    For what it's worth, when I drove the mustang, their freeway numbers are under what I was observing. I think the mustang v6 was rated 32fwy and I was getting 35 going 70mph.

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Central NY
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    I think what happened was people bought Fiestas with the 1.0L to get fuel economy ... and then got addicted to the turbo.

  8. #17
    Senior Member Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Houston
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,908
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 201 Times in 142 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by M-88 View Post
    I think what happened was people bought Fiestas with the 1.0L to get fuel economy ... and then got addicted to the turbo.
    I can tell you that's what happened when I drove the ecoboost f150.

    Since the f150 has twin turbos (one in the left and right of the engine), the turbo spool at 1.5-3.0k rpm on 2nd gear sounds addicting, to say the least.

  9. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Central NY
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    If you can avoid building pressure, they'll get good mileage.

    Once it starts building pressure, all bets of fuel econ are off. It starts running super rich to prevent detonation.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to M-88 For This Useful Post:

    Daox (06-17-2014)

  11. #19
    Senior Member Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Houston
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,908
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 201 Times in 142 Posts
    Those turbos spool up quickly, full boost at 2.5-3k rpms according to my butt dyno.

    Asking someone to drive where the ecu shifts below 2k on that truck is hard.

    Also, I love music, but when driving the f150, the sound of the turbos were enough for me to NOT have the radio on at all.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •