Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 46

Thread: Why should you buy a Mirage?

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    I only test drove one yesterday. The steering I didn't notice at all, so it wasn't so bad as to make me think to comment on it. I'd say the mirage actually feels a little big. Maybe sitting higher than I do in my Civic? I do notice that my head is closer to the roof, and I'm a little closer to the passenger. You can definitely hear the engine when you push the gas But in general it's noticeably quieter than my Civic. Since that's the car I'm currently driving, that's the car it's got to beat


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 52.3 mpg (US) ... 22.2 km/L ... 4.5 L/100 km ... 62.8 mpg (Imp)


  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    East coast
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Still on the fence about buying a Mirage. There are still some leftovers out there and the 2015's are already on dealers lots. My issue isn't the dependability of the Mirage because I think that it will probably be as reliable as a Nissan Toyota or Honda. I've never owned a Mitsubishi but I know that they build durable cars. I guess my real concern is the fact that it is a 3-clyndler, the steering, suspension and the ability to get out of it's own way. Look I'm not looking for a speed demon, just something that can hold it's own with power to weight ratio. I only drive cars with manual transmissions so if I did get a Mirage it would have to be a 5-speed.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenSkiddle View Post
    Look I'm not looking for a speed demon, just something that can hold it's own with power to weight ratio.
    You said you owned a Ford Festiva and Ford Aspire? Did their power to weight ratios put fear in you?

    Name:  cnte3txywjrn5yrhtvaf.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  58.5 KB
    http://jalopnik.com/this-brutal-nyt-mirage-review-is-whats-wrong-with-cheap-1583123298

    Sounds like it's time for you to go test drive one again.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    East coast
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    You said you owned a Ford Festiva and Ford Aspire? Did their power to weight ratios put fear in you?

    Name:  cnte3txywjrn5yrhtvaf.jpg
Views: 365
Size:  58.5 KB
    http://jalopnik.com/this-brutal-nyt-mirage-review-is-whats-wrong-with-cheap-1583123298

    Sounds like it's time for you to go test drive one again.
    A little bit but consider cars in the late 1980's and into the mid 1990's. Car's today can easily get up to speed quicker than cars of 10-20 years ago. As much as I loved the simplicity of the Fesiva and Aspire. Back road driving or city driving was always fine but they were both on the tinny side when you drove over 50mph. On the highways they did have the tendency to feel like they could get blown off the road by an 18 wheeler. The Festiva's, Aspire's and Metros were o.k. back then but if we drove these same cars out on the road today I think that it would be very difficult for them to keep up with today's modern cars. I guess where I'm going with this is that the Mirage feels like a "throw back car" and this is what my initial attraction to this car has been. However my concern despite the fact that the car was built in 2014 is to hate to think that this would be like a new car with early 1990's sophistication. Do any of you owners feel that way? Do any of you regret your purchase? If not, then I am probably wrong about my concerns for purchasing this car.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Minnesota
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    160
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenSkiddle View Post
    A little bit but consider cars in the late 1980's and into the mid 1990's. Car's today can easily get up to speed quicker than cars of 10-20 years ago. As much as I loved the simplicity of the Fesiva and Aspire. Back road driving or city driving was always fine but they were both on the tinny side when you drove over 50mph. On the highways they did have the tendency to feel like they could get blown off the road by an 18 wheeler. The Festiva's, Aspire's and Metros were o.k. back then but if we drove these same cars out on the road today I think that it would be very difficult for them to keep up with today's modern cars. I guess where I'm going with this is that the Mirage feels like a "throw back car" and this is what my initial attraction to this car has been. However my concern despite the fact that the car was built in 2014 is to hate to think that this would be like a new car with early 1990's sophistication. Do any of you owners feel that way? Do any of you regret your purchase? If not, then I am probably wrong about my concerns for purchasing this car.

    The early 1990's sophistication is the reason to buy this car. (And really, it's more late 90's sophistication) Everything is proven to work well, any kinks in this drivetrain were worked out 5+ years ago. Most other new cars sold today are going to be incredibly expensive to maintain 5 years down the road. They feature Direct Injection, High-Pressure fuel pumps, turbochargers, complex 8+ speed automatic transmissions, Hydro-electric steering, lane departure systems, Multi-zone climate control, etc. All of that new technology and those cars still can't even get equivalent gas mileage to the Mirage with it's very simple technology.

    The only thing that concerns me with the Mirage is body/paint durability. Here in Minnesota we lay the salt thick on the roads, and I'm not sure if the Mirage will hold up.

  6. #26
    Phantasmagoria
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    192
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
    Because they don't cost a lot of money, so buy 'em!!

    (Ripped off from local car dealer advertisement).

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 43.1 mpg (US) ... 18.3 km/L ... 5.5 L/100 km ... 51.8 mpg (Imp)


  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    East coast
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ahintofpepperjack View Post
    The early 1990's sophistication is the reason to buy this car. (And really, it's more late 90's sophistication) Everything is proven to work well, any kinks in this drivetrain were worked out 5+ years ago. Most other new cars sold today are going to be incredibly expensive to maintain 5 years down the road. They feature Direct Injection, High-Pressure fuel pumps, turbochargers, complex 8+ speed automatic transmissions, Hydro-electric steering, lane departure systems, Multi-zone climate control, etc. All of that new technology and those cars still can't even get equivalent gas mileage to the Mirage with it's very simple technology.

    The only thing that concerns me with the Mirage is body/paint durability. Here in Minnesota we lay the salt thick on the roads, and I'm not sure if the Mirage will hold up.
    I can see your concern about the body and paint holding up with the harsh weather that you have in Minnesota. On the east coast we never see anywhere near your brutal winters. I have an older Subaru Outback and every 4-5 years I prime a majority of the underside with Rustoleum and then paint it with Rustoleum paint(glossy). What appeared to be surface rust on my 98 Outback in 2008 is no longer visible and appears to have stopped any further progression of rust that I could see. As far as the paint goes, NUFINISH is the way to go. I've heard detail experts bust on NUFINISH because it's not a wax, etc, but I use it 3-4 times per year on my car's and never experienced rust.
    The comment that you made about newer cars developing problems 5 years down the road is actually the same thing that my mechanic said. The newer Hyundai Accents have direct injection and I think that this will present problems down the road. I will probably take the Mirage back out for a test drive and will finally decide. Thanks for your help.

  8. #28
    I agree about the body / paint concerns in climates where the winter roads are salted. It's up to the owners to be proactive about rust prevention. See crazyjerry's DIY threads on that.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  9. #29
    Senior Member Kiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Minnesota
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ahintofpepperjack View Post
    The only thing that concerns me with the Mirage is body/paint durability. Here in Minnesota we lay the salt thick on the roads, and I'm not sure if the Mirage will hold up.
    I am from Mn too... The newer mitsu body and paint is better than you may think... And most cars built today have the same thin body panels and paint. I have a hard time believing that the mirage would be even near as bad as the early 2000's mazda platforms.

    Just take care of it with regular washes etc... Or go hard core like crazyjerry

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 44.3 mpg (US) ... 18.8 km/L ... 5.3 L/100 km ... 53.2 mpg (Imp)


  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenSkiddle View Post
    The Festiva's, Aspire's and Metros were o.k. back then but if we drove these same cars out on the road today I think that it would be very difficult for them to keep up with today's modern cars.
    Oh really? Traffic today is that much faster than 10 years ago? (There were still plenty of those cars on the road 10 years back. I still have one!)

    I guess where I'm going with this is that the Mirage feels like a "throw back car" and this is what my initial attraction to this car has been. However my concern despite the fact that the car was built in 2014 is to hate to think that this would be like a new car with early 1990's sophistication.
    While the Mirage is similar to those old econoboxes in some aspects (small, light, efficient entry level car), I think it's a mistake to take the comparison much beyond that.

    It's vastly superior to all of them in terms of engine tech (eg. variable valve control, , transmission tech (CVT), safety engineering, convenience features & fuel efficiency (eg. the Mirage gets the same mileage as the last gen Metros, yet it has ~35% more power).

    Go drive one again.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •