Last edited by philby; 09-19-2015 at 05:15 PM.
The 1.0 will be fine. You just need to give it more stick. Yes - It *feels* slow, but let's put this in context... The 1.0 has 68bhp from memory and similar torque, albeit higher in the rev range. It still gets to 60mph in about 13.5 seconds. My old Hyundai i10 (1.1 manual) had 65bhp, was heavier (990-1005kg depending on exact spec) and got to 60 in a leisurely 15.6 seconds. My partner's Suzuki Alto automatic has a snarling 68bhp 998 triple just like the 1.0 Mirage and is hooked up to a Jatco 4-speed auto. That gets to 60 in 17 seconds or thereabouts. We both have occasion to drive in adverse conditions - Hilly, rural, etc.
Now - with both cars, we sometimes had/have thoughts of a 'If I had an extra xx horsepower, I'd be able to......' - of course we have. Thing is, I've previously owned some very powerful cars indeed, and that "Just a a bit more power...." thought never changes. But have we ever felt the need, like a lot of people do, to take to the internet and write a hysterical post/blog/FaceTwitterSpace update along the lines of "OMG!! My car is sooooo slow it almost killed me through its lack of speed/acceleration/warp power!!!!111111oneoneoneoneone"?
No, we haven't.
Last edited by Teasmade; 09-19-2015 at 09:18 PM. Reason: Typos...
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 3 CVT 1.2 automatic: 47.9 mpg (US) ... 20.4 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.5 mpg (Imp)
philby (09-19-2015)
Gear ratio and final drive of the european Space Star 1.0 and 1.2 are identical according to the specification tables of several countries, but I canīt find a Space Star 1.0 on the Finnish homepage?
I would make a testdrive with the car before buying it, then you will know if the car is suitable for your application.
And I didnīt find a switch to turn of traction control until now in my Space Star. Where should it be?
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2015 Space Star Klassik Kollektion+ 1.2 manual: 67.5 mpg (US) ... 28.7 km/L ... 3.5 L/100 km ... 81.0 mpg (Imp)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 3 CVT 1.2 automatic: 47.9 mpg (US) ... 20.4 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.5 mpg (Imp)
Interesting observation. I see that the 1.0 motor is offered in Norway, but not in Sweden and Finland, which is weird. If anything, the landscape is usually steeper in Norway than in either Sweden or Finland. In any case, I was planning on getting the Space Star in your country in order to save a few bucks.
Can't comment on 1L it is not sold in USA. The 1.2 5MT comes with higher final drive used on your 1L, and it is very lively at highway speeds, car has more pickup than others with double power, and rolls fine in top vear at 30MPH 50km/h.
Last edited by cyclopathic; 09-20-2015 at 12:00 PM.
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)
The 1.0 Litre isn't sold in Australia either.... Not enough grunt...
My Build Thread - http://mirageforum.com/forum/showthr...(Garage-entry)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2014 Mirage LS 1.2 manual: 38.0 mpg (US) ... 16.2 km/L ... 6.2 L/100 km ... 45.7 mpg (Imp)
I have the 1.oL with the European MT and do a lot of highway driving, but also lots of travel on very small and steep alpine roads and passes.
The 1.0 with the taller European MT is perfect for that, but If you want a sports car, buy one!
The 1.0 Mirage is great as a small family car. It is not a sports car, and if it were, I would not have bought one.
MetroMPG (09-25-2015)
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2017 Mirage G4 ES CVT 1.2 automatic: 42.0 mpg (US) ... 17.9 km/L ... 5.6 L/100 km ... 50.4 mpg (Imp)