Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 75

Thread: List of Tires to fit Mirage.

  1. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggman View Post
    If I understand correctly, a wider tire improves cornering at the expense of fuel economy. What has been member's experience on fuel economy with wider tires?
    Actually on bikes wider tire reduces rolling resistance. This is due to contact patch being wider/shorter vs narrow/long. But this is not easily transferred to cars. Due to toe wider tire will have more RR. And it doesn't take much to effect fuel economy; 0.2 degree of cross toe will have an impact.

    Another point most of the time when people upgrade to wider tire they go to larger rim, and the same tire the same width will have more RR if sidewall is lower.

    With 185/60 RT43 we took MPG hit comparing to oem Enasave, but it is hard to quantify by how much b/c of too many changes at the same time. I'd say ~3MPG. Unfortunately there aren't any LRR tire in 185/60 size.


    Last edited by cyclopathic; 10-11-2015 at 11:49 AM.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  2. #12
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,231
    Thanks
    4,063
    Thanked 2,820 Times in 2,126 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    Actually on bikes wider tire reduces rolling resistance.
    Not sure this matches with conventional wisdom as all race bike use skinny tires. Good fodder for arguments & debates though.

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    With 185/60 RT43 we took MPG hit comparing to oem Enasave, but it is hard to quantify by how much b/c of too many changes at the same time. I'd say ~3MPG. Unfortunately there aren't any LRR tire in 185/60 size.
    That's what I figured. Has this been the case with others who have switched to wider tires?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  3. #13
    Moderator inuvik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Coos Bay, OR
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,838
    Thanks
    4,821
    Thanked 1,565 Times in 1,122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggman View Post
    Not sure this matches with conventional wisdom as all race bike use skinny tires. Good fodder for arguments & debates though.

    That's what I figured. Has this been the case with others who have switched to wider tires?

    What is the effect of using the LRR OEM size tire but going to a wider rim? I plan on using the 165/65r14's on the 14x6 WRC rims.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 40.5 mpg (US) ... 17.2 km/L ... 5.8 L/100 km ... 48.6 mpg (Imp)


  4. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggman View Post
    Not sure this matches with conventional wisdom as all race bike
    Read this http://www.schwalbe.com/en/rollwiderstand.html
    Why do wide tires roll better than narrower tires?

    The answer to this question lies in tire deflection. Each tire is flattened a little under load. This creates a flat contact area.

    At the same inflation pressure, a wide and a narrow tire have the same contact area. A wide tire is flattened over its width whereas a narrow tire has a slimmer but longer contact area.

    The flattened area can be considered detrimental to tire rotation. Because of the longer flattened area of the narrow tire, the wheel loses more of its “roundness” and produces more deformation during the rotation. In a wide tire, the flattened area is shorter in length and does not have so much effect on the rolling direction. The tire stays “rounder” and therefore it rolls better.
    With respect to MPG loss it isn't due to wider tire, it is due to switch to non-LRR tire. The difference between the two rims with the same tire should be negligible.

    I have experimented with toe on Prius, and you can get esealy 3-4 MPG improvement by setting front toe to 0. This is on a car which had alignment within OEM specs. I suspect on something like H rated RT-43 with extra thick sidewalls rated at 51psi, the difference could be even bigger. I think we have cross-toe set to 0.1deg right now.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  5. #15
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,231
    Thanks
    4,063
    Thanked 2,820 Times in 2,126 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    ROFL I'll let all the Tour De France riders know they got it all wrong.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Eggman For This Useful Post:

    Alex1a1f (12-10-2016)

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    salt lake city UTAH
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
    BFGoodrich g-Force Super Sport A/S 185/60R14

    I am on my second pair of these and they are horrible. They shake at 70 up to 90. Pardon my french but they suck ****, only time they feel good is when you are under 65.

    Be warned the second set was warranty replacement from BFG!!



    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    This is a US or Perhaps North America list. There likely alot more choices in 14" in other countries.

    OEM 165/65R14 size:
    Dunlop ENASAVE 01 A/S - $94 LRR OEM
    Bridgestone POTENZA RE92 - $80 LRR (OEM on Insight gen1)

    winter:
    Dunlop SP WINTER RESPONSE - $73
    Dunlop WINTER MAXX - $75


    185/60R14 (+1.3%)
    General RT-43 - $58
    BFGoodrich g-Force Super Sport A/S 185/60R14 - $80
    multiple Kumho, Federal also Hankook Optima H426

    winter:
    Yokohama ICEGUARD IG52C - $57
    General ALTIMAX ARCTIC -$62
    Firestone Winterforce - $65
    Goodyear ULTRA GRIP WINTER -$66

    Prices are take from TireRack as an example only.

  8. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    LA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts
    will 195/65/14 work on my 14x6 wheel? I have 185/60/14 now and they are fine

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2017 Mirage G4 ES CVT 1.2 automatic: 42.0 mpg (US) ... 17.9 km/L ... 5.6 L/100 km ... 50.4 mpg (Imp)


  9. #18
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by remusrm View Post
    will 195/65/14 work on my 14x6 wheel? I have 185/60/14 now and they are fine
    Any size (given they're not too big to rub) would work. Issue is if it differs too much from OEM then you have mismatch between wheels and spare (this could trigger ESP and damage differential), and speedo will lbe off by good margin. 185/60 is bigger by 1.3% only. I haven't tried it yet with spare, but if I have to, I will put spare on rear, and full size tire upfront.
    Last edited by cyclopathic; 10-22-2015 at 04:27 AM.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  10. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Manitoba
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    512
    Thanks
    179
    Thanked 95 Times in 66 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    I used to believe this too, as an avid cyclist and user of big apples, fat franks, and 2" marathon supremes. Someone on this forum, though noted the difference between a bias-ply bike tire casing and a radial car tire - apples to oranges, and wider tires are not more efficient on a car. On a bike, the wider tire is only more efficient for rolling resistance at the same pressure. The narrower tire can run a higher pressure, and will also have less mass, so acceleration will be improved.

    As for car tires, wider tires do have more friction, which is good for handling, but uses a bit more energy to both roll and due to greater frontal area (aerodynamics).

    My winter tires use considerably more gas because they are made of a softer rubber.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)


  11. #20
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Canoehead View Post
    I used to believe this too, as an avid cyclist and user of big apples, fat franks, and 2" marathon supremes. Someone on this forum, though noted the difference between a bias-ply bike tire casing and a radial car tire - apples to oranges, and wider tires are not more efficient on a car. On a bike, the wider tire is only more efficient for rolling resistance at the same pressure. The narrower tire can run a higher pressure, and will also have less mass, so acceleration will be improved.

    As for car tires, wider tires do have more friction, which is good for handling, but uses a bit more energy to both roll and due to greater frontal area (aerodynamics).

    My winter tires use considerably more gas because they are made of a softer rubber.
    I've dug around in EU fuel efficiency labels, and while the difference insignificant, in general wider Michelin tires were more efficient, in some cases enough to go from C to B category. It is inconclusive, b/c in case of Michelin they have different versions of the tire, and you may also have the pattern change going from one size to another.

    Now I agree with you that radial tires are completely different animal, and the difference isn't that great anyways.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •