Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: E15 gasoline and how it might effect the Mitsubishi Mirage

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Car Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Waco, Texas
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 182 Times in 122 Posts

    E15 gasoline and how it might effect the Mitsubishi Mirage

    For those here in the United States, you may or may not know this but sooner rather than later our gasoline is changing yet again. The Environmental Protection Agency has mandated an increase of ethanol in our gasoline. Right now, a majority of the fuel available is E10. This means there is 90% gasoline mixed in with 10% of ethanol. Well, pretty soon there will be a transition over to E15. This will be 85% gasoline and 15% ethanol.

    Well, that's only a 5% increase in ethanol so no big deal, right? Not quit. It is a rather very big deal. Look in your owners manual and you will see a warning stating that use of fuel containing more than 10% ethanol can adversely effect your car, and ANY damage caused from using fuels with more than 10% ethanol WILL NOT be covered by your warranty.

    Yes, that's right folks. E15 can cause problems with our cars, and any problems associated with E15 will not be covered under the Mitsubishi warranty.


    So what exactly can E15 do to an engine that is not designed for it? For starters, ethanol causes rubber to break down. So ANY rubber in the fuel system can be damaged. This includes any rubber fuel lines (I need to check to see if the Mirage has any rubber fuel lines) to rubber O rings on the fuel injectors to rubber O rings and seals in the fuel tank. E15 can also make your car run lean, as in the air/fuel ratio is not in the ideal area. When a vehicle runs lean, you can burn up valves, it can cause over heating of the catalytic converters which can cause them to melt down, and it can even cause the engine to over heat.


    So, what can we do about it? I am researching this and will have to get back to everyone but I would appreciate if any one has any ideas. The main point of this post is to inform our board members and try to get this figured out before it becomes an issue.


    Here is a link where you can read a little more about this.

    https://www.yahoo.com/autos/feds-pus...164706945.html


    Here is another link, but the statement at the top of the page in contradicted by the article;

    http://www.petroleumsolutionsinc.com...e-Fuel-Volumes

    "(The)EPA has taken a significant step in the right direction by using its waiver authority to lower ethanol mandates, acknowledging the market limitations of the ethanol blend wall,” he said. “However, the agency must do more to protect consumers. EPA’s final rule relies on unrealistic increases in sales of higher ethanol fuel blends despite the fact that most cars cannot use them. Motorists have largely rejected these fuels.”
    Certified holder of useless car knowledge.

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    I think it likely be ok, but what will happen with warranties??


    here is another article in PM:
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...-e15-15096134/
    One study conducted at Kettering University found no remarkable degradation in fuel systems all the way back to 1995 model years. But the main issue is whether or not your vehicle will be covered under warranty for any damage caused by E15 usage, and in many cases the answer is no.
    Will this damage my lawnmower, boat, jet ski, snowmobile, or four-wheeler?

    It sure will if you don't pay attention. Generally, small engines are not designed to deal with the more corrosive E15 blend. And, as we mentioned in 2010, ethanol forms a brown goo when left in a fuel tank too long, which can clog fuel-system components. Two-stroke engines run hotter with an ethanol blend, which accelerates the potential damage. And ethanol can wreak havoc on fiberglass fuel tanks in older boats.
    Last edited by cyclopathic; 12-04-2015 at 03:19 PM.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  3. #3
    Senior Member mitsumi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Manila
    Country
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,243
    Thanks
    766
    Thanked 469 Times in 288 Posts
    knowledge is power! better be safe than sorry

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage GLS 1.2 manual: 3,108.4 mpg (US) ... 1,321.5 km/L ... 0.1 L/100 km ... 3,733.0 mpg (Imp)


  4. #4
    Senior Member Cobrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    1,197
    Thanked 1,849 Times in 1,102 Posts
    Sheesh...we (and the world) can eat our corn, or we can burn it in our cars. We can't do both. More energy is used making and transporting ethanol than it saves when used as a motor fuel, not to mention the amount of potable water it requires. The ethanol mandate is a joke, and is really nothing more than a gift to the corn lobby to keep prices up. Wanna know how European cars get such good mileage? They are running 100% gasoline, not gasoline cut with vodka and a bunch of other crap.

    It was a neat idea, but it's time to abandon it.

    As to damage to rubber parts, natural rubber isn't really used anymore. It's just too expensive. Since the mid 1990s manufacturers have used 'viton' or some other kind of synthethic rubber, which is highly resistant to ethanol.
    Last edited by Cobrajet; 12-05-2015 at 08:35 AM.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Cobrajet For This Useful Post:

    91cavgt (12-07-2015)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Manitoba
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    512
    Thanks
    179
    Thanked 95 Times in 66 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Cobrajet View Post
    Sheesh...we (and the world) can eat our corn, or we can burn it in our cars. We can't do both. More energy is used making and transporting ethanol than it saves when used as a motor fuel, not to mention the amount of potable water it requires. The ethanol mandate is a joke, and is really nothing more than a gift to the corn lobby to keep prices up. Wanna know how European cars get such good mileage? They are running 100% gasoline, not gasoline cut with vodka and a bunch of other crap.

    It was a neat idea, but it's time to abandon it.
    Agreed. I'm no expert, but I attended a university lecture/conference on this subject and all agreed that energy return on investment made ethanol a no go. Some further noted that not only is it bad economics, but it is also bad ethics, considering that there are people going hungry. If some of the yet unproven technologies of making ethanol from waste were to come on line the equation would change, but currently, putting petro-chemical fertilizer on farmland with diesel tractors, then shipping the crops by truck to be fermented in large plants is wasteful, bad for the economy, bad for the environment, and of course bad for people.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)


  7. #6
    Senior Member chris_top_her's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    san antonio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    104
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
    For most newer cars... 15% or any higher mix of ethanol mainly comes down to this question: is the engine tuned to run it. Basically if it's not flex fuel, then no it is not. I can have my engine (aftermarket) tuned to run e85 and gain 30+whp literally (not worth the hassle of mixing imo), with no adverse effects on anything else. Of course if your mix I incorrect the engine will run like ****.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Cobrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    1,197
    Thanked 1,849 Times in 1,102 Posts
    It is my understanding that E15 is going to be offered alongside of E10 for the foreseeable future. E10 isn't going away.

    So the question for the greenies becomes, "Do I want to pay MORE for fuel that I will get LESS mileage out of?"

  9. #8
    Car Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Waco, Texas
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 182 Times in 122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Cobrajet View Post
    It is my understanding that E15 is going to be offered alongside of E10 for the foreseeable future. E10 isn't going away.

    So the question for the greenies becomes, "Do I want to pay MORE for fuel that I will get LESS mileage out of?"

    Only gas stations that want to invest in new pumps and tanks could do this so that really narrows down which gas stations could even afford to do it.


    Greenies have had a choice for several years. E85 has been around for quit some time and readily available, but it has been an utter failure. If I have time I'm going to look into a very, VERY small water injection system that will help to cool off the combustion temps, assist the computer in advancing the ignition timing, and helping to cool off the intake and exhaust valves. The big key though is to find an injector that is small enough.
    Certified holder of useless car knowledge.

  10. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    @91cavgt agree unless it is mandatory across the board and replacing E10 it would be another E85. Something to avoid not to buy.

    BTW If someone wants to run E15 they can do it now all they need is .6gal of E85 for every 10 gal of already mandatory E10. But why?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  11. #10
    Car Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Waco, Texas
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 182 Times in 122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    @91cavgt agree unless it is mandatory across the board and replacing E10 it would be another E85. Something to avoid not to buy.
    From what I have read about the EPA mandate, they are mandating an increase in ethanol usage, and the only way to meet their goals is to mandate a switch from E10 to E15, but even with that switch there is no guarantee of hitting the mandated amount used. Multiple manufactures have petitioned the EPA to not do this switch for fear of problems caused from the increase of ethanol. Those problems would of course not be covered by any warranty. If there were virtually no risk for damage then the manufactures would not have put warnings in most of the owners manuals of new cars.


    Yet another problem that has not been discussed yet is ethanol is hygroscopic, meaning that it absorbs water. This does not have to be liquid water that ethanol comes in contact with, but just water vapor in the air can be absorbed. As long as gasoline suppliers, refiners, and gas stations implement E85 techniques to keep water out of the fuel then all will be well. But if that does not happen then there will be more fuel filters clogged with water, fuel injectors damaged, and engines miss firing because of the water in the fuel.
    Certified holder of useless car knowledge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •