Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Why was there no 2016 model year Mirage in North America?

  1. #1

    Why was there no 2016 model year Mirage in North America?

    Traditionally in North America, next year's model shows up in the fall (eg. Sept-Sept cycle). Mirage has not followed this pattern AT ALL. (Neither has the competing Nissan Micra in Canada.)

    Anybody have any theories?

    - Possibly to prop up the resale value of the 2015 model, since it had a longer than normal run before a replacement showed up (through to March of 2016)?

    - The 2017 model year is having a similarly long run before its replacement shows up.

    ---

    In Canada, Nissan played similarly strange model year shenanigans with the competing Micra: initially introduced in April 2014 as a 2015 model, the 2016 Micra wasn't released until March of 2016. That's a TWO YEAR run (minus 1 month) for the 2015 model year!

    In many countries outside of N.A., cars are sold by calendar year (date of manufacture, I assume), not arbitrary "model years".


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 63.2 mpg (US) ... 26.9 km/L ... 3.7 L/100 km ... 75.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #2
    Oh, and another thing:

    If Mitsu had put out a 2016 model year Mirage in the U.S., they would have been able to continue marketing it with the pre-2017 EPA mileage figures, which look better in advertising. (2017 EPA changes reduced most vehicles' ratings, even with no mechanical changes:Stricter EPA testing for 2017 model year - be careful making comparisons )

    Which makes me wonder if there might have been some other regulatory incentive that prompted them to skip 2016.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 63.2 mpg (US) ... 26.9 km/L ... 3.7 L/100 km ... 75.9 mpg (Imp)


  3. #3
    Senior Member MightyMirageMpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    wi
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    760
    Thanks
    457
    Thanked 317 Times in 203 Posts
    The car was dogged so widely and hard here I'm a bit skeptical the real reason wasn't supply and demand. You can still purchase brand new mailslots (pre facelift) which will now be 2 year old "New" cars by the calandar, and possibly 2-1/2 years old per build date.

  4. #4
    That's a possibility...

    An Ottawa dealer just sold 5 brand new 2014's:
    Thread: brand new 2014 Mirages in Ottawa, $5000 discount (top trim)


    The lack of a 2016 model year just bit Mitsu in the butt again: a newspaper I read just did a roundup of the most fuel efficient cars, and currently the Spark & Fiesta 1.0 rank higher than the Mirage because they're 2016 model years, and the Mirage is under the stricter 2017 EPA ratings. Of course they don't mention that.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 63.2 mpg (US) ... 26.9 km/L ... 3.7 L/100 km ... 75.9 mpg (Imp)


  5. #5
    Senior Member MightyMirageMpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    wi
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    760
    Thanks
    457
    Thanked 317 Times in 203 Posts
    With relatively cheap gas prices, and other glutten-minded issues, USA is clearly not the Mirages bread and butter market. (Yes i realize we aren't the ones in this continent)

    How well does the car sell in other countries? Is there a demand or do they sit stagnant elsewhere?

  6. #6
    Senior Member IchabodCrane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Thunder Bay, ON. CA
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    726
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 317 Times in 191 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    That's a possibility...

    An Ottawa dealer just sold 5 brand new 2014's:
    Thread: brand new 2014 Mirages in Ottawa, $5000 discount (top trim)


    The lack of a 2016 model year just bit Mitsu in the butt again: a newspaper I read just did a roundup of the most fuel efficient cars, and currently the Spark & Fiesta 1.0 rank higher than the Mirage because they're 2016 model years, and the Mirage is under the stricter 2017 EPA ratings. Of course they don't mention that.
    Most publications compare specs on current year models or "new" models of the various manufacturers. Since Mitsubishi has no 2016 model Mirage it should never have been included in their flawed comparison. This simply illustrates bad judgement and poor reporting on the part of said publication.
    It may be that this is the kind of biased anti-Mitsubishi BS
    Mitsu was trying to avoid by skipping 2016 model year.
    Will weld for beer.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 automatic: 45.3 mpg (US) ... 19.3 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.5 mpg (Imp)


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to IchabodCrane For This Useful Post:

    Eggman (12-30-2016)

  8. #7
    Senior Member Top_Fuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,694
    Thanks
    2,572
    Thanked 2,532 Times in 1,467 Posts
    Just out of curiosity...

    How long did Mitsubishi build 2015 Mirages? My 2015 ES was built in October, 2015. I assume that was near the end of the production run before they started building 2017s?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 52.2 mpg (US) ... 22.2 km/L ... 4.5 L/100 km ... 62.6 mpg (Imp)


  9. #8
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,120
    Thanks
    4,030
    Thanked 2,781 Times in 2,100 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by IchabodCrane View Post
    This simply illustrates bad judgement and poor reporting on the part of said publication.
    I think it's because clickbait pays.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  10. #9
    Senior Member BostonJellyBean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Boston MA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    287
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 71 Times in 44 Posts
    Remember when you could buy a Kia Rio or Hyundai accent hatch for 8.5k with 10/100 warranty?
    I do.
    Whole point is.... They're just as basic. They're not worth 14,15,16k. Hate to say it.
    I have a 15 and 17. The 17 rides and handles way better than the 15. I paid 9200 for the 15 Es with 33k and I paid 11,500 for the 17 es with 18 miles.
    The 17 rides bettwr, but I think the 15 looks better. Hate to say it.... But the es with manual and power windows / radio only should be at about 8800 new with 5mt. Even at 11,500 I was hesitant.... But I'm in love with the mirage brand. But you can't be paying 2017 toyota prices for 2000s economy cars

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2017 Mirage Es 1.2 manual: 38.7 mpg (US) ... 16.4 km/L ... 6.1 L/100 km ... 46.5 mpg (Imp)

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2017 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 42.0 mpg (US) ... 17.9 km/L ... 5.6 L/100 km ... 50.4 mpg (Imp)


  11. #10
    Senior Member Cobrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,126
    Thanks
    1,197
    Thanked 1,848 Times in 1,101 Posts
    I always assumed the reason that the 2016 MY was skipped by Mitsubishi was that they were really surprised at how well the Mirage was selling in the US, despite the bad press, low gas prices, and no advertising. So they decided to take immediate steps to 'Americanize' the car. The easiest way to do that was by skipping '16, hastily reworking the car a little (suspension, styling, brakes), and releasing it as a '17 ASAP...hopefully to more positive reviews.

    The alternative would be to release the updated model as a '2016.5' model, something which has been done in the past by automakers when production is started towards mid-year instead of late summer or early fall. The original Mustang was released in April, 1964, and is referred to as a '1964 1/2' model.

    It really isn't unusual for a manufacturer to skip a model year in response to changing market conditions and/or production delays.

    Did you know there was no Chevrolet Corvette in 1983?



  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Cobrajet For This Useful Post:

    MetroMPG (12-31-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •