Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Wikipedia's page for the Mirage / Space Star is not good. UPDATE: it's better!

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Wikipedia's page for the Mirage / Space Star is not good. UPDATE: it's better!



    Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubi...0.93present.29

    Whoever wrote the section called "Reception" about the current generation car decided to focus exclusively on the negative.

    The opening sentence is: "The Mirage was met with negative reviews in Europe and Australia."

    And it goes from there quoting the terrible Top Gear UK review.

    I think that opening sentence is factually incorrect - the car has had mixed reception/reviews (as do most vehicles). Furthermore, it seems the car's critical reception varies quite a bit from country to country. As it's written now, the page gives the incorrect impression the car has had universally bad reviews.

    Anybody here have experience editing Wikipedia? Considering how insanely popular Wiki is when people are searching for anything, that section is bad news. It's not balanced at all.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •