Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: US: Just In: Small, underpowered 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage (ConsumerReports.org)

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by festiboi View Post
    I was a Live Advice Specialist for them; basically giving car buying advice, suggestions, and tips
    Interesting gig.


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #22

    Surprise: not the worst subcompact

    After reading & watching Consumer Reports talk about the Mirage, I have to admit am surprised by their "Worst Vehicles to Avoid" list.

    Because it doesn't include the Mirage.

    Here are the vehicles to avoid, according to Consumer Reports:
    Subcompact cars

    • Smart ForTwo
    • Scion iQ
    • Chevrolet Spark
    Source: http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/2014...orst-vehicles/

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  3. #23
    Senior Member grsupercity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    817
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts
    I was puzzled to see the new Outlander on there. I drove a new 14 and found it to be very nice. Only drawback to the lancer is the mid 2000's interior! Other then that its one of the sportiest looking and best handling cars in its class!

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    NE
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    548
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 81 Times in 62 Posts
    Got our Annual Car edition and take it with a grain of salt .

  5. #25
    CR gets around to posting a YouTube video version of their review.

    It's no less nasty than the print version:



    Direct link to this video's comments page:
    https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=1vNk9ezbHwE

    I think a pre-requisite for being a car reviewer is you should have to be capable of pronouncing the name of the automaker.

    Mishabeeshi?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  6. #26
    And AutoBlog covers the CR video:

    http://www.autoblog.com/2014/06/24/c...-review-video/

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  7. #27
    Car Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Waco, Texas
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 182 Times in 122 Posts
    One thing you have to remember about the people giving bad reviews of the Mirage is this. Look at the cars they typically test drive. Audi's, Porsche's, BMW's, Mercede's, Jaquar's, and other mid to high end luxury cars. Then look at all the sports cars they test drive. Unfortunately, most of the writers directly compare the Mirage to these cars, which is wrong. It's like knocking the BMW M3 because it doesn't even come close to getting the fuel economy of the Mirage. I have seen a nice long term test video from a place in Canada that gave the Mirage rave reviews because the guy that reviewed it looked at the car from an economy car perspective instead of a sports sedan perspective.


    Certified holder of useless car knowledge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •