View Poll Results: What do you think of the Mirage's looks?

Voters
90. You may not vote on this poll
  • Looks good. I like it.

    60 66.67%
  • It is fine, I'd drive it.

    25 27.78%
  • It looks a bit dated.

    3 3.33%
  • Ugly... just ugly.

    2 2.22%
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 89

Thread: What do you think of the Mirage's looks / styling?

  1. #41
    Carmageddon m4v3r1ck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Hague
    Country
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,347
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked 103 Times in 79 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by talldino View Post
    Here in the Low Lands sedans are very unpopular, the Dutch love their hatchbacks.
    i don't get it. I love sedans, if only mirage also available in sedan i would definitely pick the sedan without thinking twice. Sedan looks exclusive and elegant, hatchbacks looks cheap


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2013 Mirage 1.0 manual: 47.5 mpg (US) ... 20.2 km/L ... 5.0 L/100 km ... 57.0 mpg (Imp)


  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Alabama
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by talldino View Post
    The Mirage was not drawn by a creative soul in an office, but in the wind-tunnel. Smart move.
    I totally agree. I could care less what my car looks like. I bought the Mirage for the high MPG, practical room on the inside and low cost.

    I've always wondered how much "styling" adds to the cost and takes away from the practicality of a car. For example if you told the best car engineer to design a car with high mpg, interior space, and low cost, but with zero regard for style, what would it look like?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 1.2 automatic: 39.7 mpg (US) ... 16.9 km/L ... 5.9 L/100 km ... 47.6 mpg (Imp)


  3. #43
    Administrator Daox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Germantown, WI
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    4,999
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 1,804 Times in 1,017 Posts
    It would look a lot like this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_1-litre_car

    Using diesel alone the car is capable of up to 2.0 l/100 km (120 mpg-US; 140 mpg-imp).
    Name:  Volkswagen_XL1.jpg
Views: 398
Size:  35.7 KB
    Custom Mirage products: Cruise control kit, Glove box light, MAF sensor housing, Rear sway bar, Upper grill block

    Current project: DIY Nitrous oxide setup for ~$100

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 47.2 mpg (US) ... 20.1 km/L ... 5.0 L/100 km ... 56.7 mpg (Imp)


  4. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Alabama
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Daox View Post

    Doesn't look roomy enough. Make it a hatchback and a little taller and it might work.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 1.2 automatic: 39.7 mpg (US) ... 16.9 km/L ... 5.9 L/100 km ... 47.6 mpg (Imp)


  5. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Madison320 View Post
    Doesn't look roomy enough. Make it a hatchback and a little taller and it might work.
    Then it would look like this

    Name:  280px-Mercedes-Benz_bionic_car.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  11.8 KB

    Mercedes-Benz Bionic
    concept - Mercedes reported a drag coefficient of 0.19;[2]

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Alabama
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    Then it would look like this

    Name:  280px-Mercedes-Benz_bionic_car.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  11.8 KB

    Mercedes-Benz Bionic
    concept - Mercedes reported a drag coefficient of 0.19;[2]
    Nice!

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 1.2 automatic: 39.7 mpg (US) ... 16.9 km/L ... 5.9 L/100 km ... 47.6 mpg (Imp)


  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Country is Europe, state is Germany
    Country
    Germany
    Posts
    1,727
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 1,172 Times in 675 Posts
    I think it looks like a car should, not like some ridiculous caricature.
    Having said that, I think a car should be of practical use, why else would you buy it?

    For example: On many competing new models the bottom part of the rear windows are up much higher than the front ones, totally stupid. If you have ever had a kid in the rear strapped into a child seat, and the kid can't see out of the too high window, it will scream its head off. Terror for everyone in the car. You will never want to travel in that car with a kid again. The mirage is different.

    Another point, it will not look old-fashioned in a few years.

    Another point: It was made to be cheap to buy and operate without looking cheap, to be light weight and to have an excellent aerodynamic design. A real aerodynamic design, not just a fake aerodynamic look. Many other cars may look like aerodynamic without being so. Rather like flying with air brakes on.

    Another point: Look at the power of the engine and compare it to the maximum speed. Look at competing models. Similar powered cars will not get that fast - so much for the aerodynamics. Good aerodynamics saves you a lot of money. In this county most highways have no speed limits, and this car is good for a comfortable ride around 130kmh. What more do you want?
    foama
    Last edited by foama; 05-17-2014 at 08:35 AM.

  8. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Pattaya Thailand
    Country
    Thailand
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
    I always thought the Mirage looked good from most angles but maybe not from the front. I think the sedan has corrected that and looks great, especially at a $15,000 price.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    NE
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    548
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 81 Times in 62 Posts
    ^ ^ .

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    422
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 93 Times in 64 Posts
    Eh ... the face of the sedan looks like a clone of every other car out there.

    I prefer the Mirage's face



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •