Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Why no push rod engine?

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Miami
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    58
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pimp_Daddy_Patty View Post
    The truth about pushrod technology is that it isn't nearly as efficient or powerful as ohc tech. This is why GM and Mopar pushrod engines need 6+ litres to make the same power as the the Ford Coyote V8. And as far as diesel performance, diesels are more expensive to buy and maintain, most parts cost a fortune, and they are a lot more finicky with maintenance. Oh they're also slow AF.
    Correction: Wasn't as efficient. Times have changed.
    Push rods are better at low revs, while worse at high revs. But with a correct gearing the engine doesn't need to go as high in revs. And especially a small body style like the mirage, suffering only low drag coefficient, it would seriously increase the car's effectiveness in the city. The possibility of using taller gears, improves on the engine's efficiency even more!



  2. #22
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,231
    Thanks
    4,062
    Thanked 2,820 Times in 2,126 Posts
    I once thought diesels were cool but anymore I'm not drawn to the noisy, stinky engines so I guess I'm biased.

    At this point I'm not sure if the discussion is about pushrod or diesel technology.

    Can a comparison be made based on displacement?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    127
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 62 Times in 44 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
    Correction: Wasn't as efficient. Times have changed.
    Push rods are better at low revs, while worse at high revs. But with a correct gearing the engine doesn't need to go as high in revs. And especially a small body style like the mirage, suffering only low drag coefficient, it would seriously increase the car's effectiveness in the city. The possibility of using taller gears, improves on the engine's efficiency even more!
    Using a push rod setup would eliminate MIVEC would it not?

    Also, most OHV designs are limited to two valves per cylinder, which would reduce efficiency over most OHC engines which have at least 4 valves per cylinder (like the 3A9 engines in the Mirage).

    Same reason why most small car manufacturers who make small engines also use some form of Variable Valve Technology, something that isn't possible/feasible in OHV-Pushrod engines.
    Last edited by javensbukan; 06-17-2020 at 01:24 PM.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    157
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 83 Times in 48 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
    Correction: Wasn't as efficient. Times have changed.
    Push rods are better at low revs, while worse at high revs. But with a correct gearing the engine doesn't need to go as high in revs. And especially a small body style like the mirage, suffering only low drag coefficient, it would seriously increase the car's effectiveness in the city. The possibility of using taller gears, improves on the engine's efficiency even more!
    I'm not sure where you get your information, but pushrods aren't even better than ohc at low revs, they are simple nearly as good. Our Mivec provides efficiency and torque production at both low and high revs, where it would only he one or the other with static cam timing.

    The only reason pushrod engines exist is because of packaging reasons. Ohc engines require massive cylinder heads, and in V8 format this makes the engines incredibly wide. Especially when you want to make a larger displacement engine. See the 4.6 DOHC v8 below VS the 5.0L pushrod engine on the right.

    Name:  IMG_5356.jpg
Views: 293
Size:  91.0 KB

    Another thing regarding pushrod V8s and direct injection. The next v8 to go into the corvette will be OHC. Because the pushrod V8 runs all valve off of one cam, and at the very end, the DI pump also runs off of it, the design is near its maximum regarding fuel flow and pressure, where anymore will see cams actually breaking. Hence the plan to move to OHC engines in the corvette.
    '17 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2L ES Plus 5MT
    '94 Ford Ranger 5.0 Turbo 3 Speed

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Pimp_Daddy_Patty For This Useful Post:

    gone.a (10-01-2020)

  6. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    157
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 83 Times in 48 Posts
    Any perceived increase in low speed power production in modern pushrod engines is a product of displacement and modern cylinder head design. It has nothing to do with how the valves are actuated other than variable timing.
    '17 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2L ES Plus 5MT
    '94 Ford Ranger 5.0 Turbo 3 Speed

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Pimp_Daddy_Patty For This Useful Post:

    Loren (06-17-2020)

  8. #26
    Senior Member Top_Fuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,708
    Thanks
    2,603
    Thanked 2,540 Times in 1,474 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pimp_Daddy_Patty View Post
    The only reason pushrod engines exist is because of packaging reasons.
    Packaging...and light weight...and simplicity...and reliability...and lower manufacturing costs.


    GM is going into OHC V8s and Ford is going into pushrods. What is the world coming to?!?

    An Inside Look at Ford’s All-New 7.3L Pushrod V8

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 52.2 mpg (US) ... 22.2 km/L ... 4.5 L/100 km ... 62.6 mpg (Imp)


  9. #27
    Still Plays With Cars Loren's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Florida
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,225
    Thanks
    324
    Thanked 936 Times in 539 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pimp_Daddy_Patty View Post
    Any perceived increase in low speed power production in modern pushrod engines is a product of displacement and modern cylinder head design. It has nothing to do with how the valves are actuated other than variable timing.
    This. /Thread
    Simplify and add lightness.

  10. #28
    They probably realized all those timing chains are a pita. Seems most vehicles are becoming more disposable. I think it was a colorado or 1500 silverado that has a belt at the back of the engine that runs an oil pump for some stupid reason. The only way to inspect or replace it is to pull the engine or transmission. smfh.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE wussie cvt edition. 1.2 automatic: 37.7 mpg (US) ... 16.0 km/L ... 6.2 L/100 km ... 45.3 mpg (Imp)


  11. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    157
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 83 Times in 48 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Top_Fuel View Post
    Packaging...and light weight...and simplicity...and reliability...and lower manufacturing costs.


    GM is going into OHC V8s and Ford is going into pushrods. What is the world coming to?!?

    An Inside Look at Ford’s All-New 7.3L Pushrod V8
    I'd like to agree with the reliability part, but both ohc and pushrod engines have proven dead reliable in some cases (Honda engines, Chevy LS and LT1 engines) and also complete time bombs in others (chrysler 4.7 SOHC, Hemi pushrod, Fiat 1.4)
    '17 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2L ES Plus 5MT
    '94 Ford Ranger 5.0 Turbo 3 Speed

  12. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Miami
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    58
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pimp_Daddy_Patty View Post
    The truth about pushrod technology is that it isn't nearly as efficient or powerful as ohc tech. This is why GM and Mopar pushrod engines need 6+ litres to make the same power as the the Ford Coyote V8. And as far as diesel performance, diesels are more expensive to buy and maintain, most parts cost a fortune, and they are a lot more finicky with maintenance. Oh they're also slow AF.
    Depends on how you look at it,
    For small engines, they're indeed slow, because most of their power is down low.
    Which means if they can keep up with a gasoline engine on 0-60, they won't at 60-100.
    On the other hand, if they had the same size and HP as gasoline engines being equal at 60-100MPH, they would outdo gasoline engines at 0-60.

    Diesels have torque. The right diesel sized engine is actually very fast.
    Trucks are competing with race cars, because they can.

    However, for a Mirage, a 3 cylinder 1-1.3L Diesel engine capped at 75HP, but 120LB Ft of torque, would definitely help.
    Then add a small turbo to it with a wastegate, and you have a super efficient engine that probably doesn't even need an intercooler!



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •