Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: ECO Mod: Howto reduce level of enrichment when cold

  1. #11
    Senior Member Cobrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    1,197
    Thanked 1,849 Times in 1,102 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by flatbroke View Post
    And that's great. A flash or component replacement by the manufacturer is fine.
    It's a re-flash. I had it done on mine. Glad to hear the cold-start enrichment can be corrected with some ingenuity and without a trip to the dealer, though.



  2. #12
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,248
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by foama View Post
    R1 x (R2 + 2500 Ohms)
    ----------------------------------- = resistance of the modified circuit at a given temperature.
    R1 + ( R2 + 2500 Ohms)
    For some reason that equation doesn't look right to me. I thought calculating parallel circuits dealt with the reciprocal of the sum of reciprocals.

    I forget the formula - it's been a while since I've done this. But I think I see what you are saying.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 42 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Cobrajet View Post
    It's a re-flash. I had it done on mine. Glad to hear the cold-start enrichment can be corrected with some ingenuity and without a trip to the dealer, though.
    I can't sugar coat this, that's a hack job repair. You go to the dealer, you sit in the lounge and have a cup of coffee and a doughnut while watching ESPN or checking facebook, while a qualified tech does an update on your ECM. Costs you nothing other than a little time and a little gas.Sounds much better than trying to booger an extra coolant sensor into a factory engine harness.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Country is Europe, state is Germany
    Country
    Germany
    Posts
    1,735
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 1,177 Times in 679 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggman View Post
    For some reason that equation doesn't look right to me. I thought calculating parallel circuits dealt with the reciprocal of the sum of reciprocals.

    I forget the formula - it's been a while since I've done this. But I think I see what you are saying.
    The formula is definitely correct for the total circuit at whatever given temperature.
    You could compare that value with the value of the unmodified circuit, and look it up in the graph what that value means in terms of reported temperature. That is the difference this mod makes.
    You can try it or leave it, I have it working in the Mirage and also in a completely different other car.


    The point is, this mod reduces the enrichment below whatever the ECU would otherwise do.

    Its fine if they reflash your ECU because enrichment is way too much, but thats a different issue.
    Last edited by foama; 05-19-2016 at 06:19 AM.

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Forgive my ignorance but does Mirage have one sensor or two?

    DSM had 2 sensors. ECU was going nuts until we replaced the 2nd one. There was no errors on OBD2 reported to indicate that this was an issue.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Britain
    Country
    UK
    Posts
    158
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 57 Times in 40 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    Forgive my ignorance but does Mirage have one sensor or two?

    DSM had 2 sensors. ECU was going nuts until we replaced the 2nd one. There was no errors on OBD2 reported to indicate that this was an issue.
    Having looked at the service manual and circuit diagram, it appears there's just one sensor. That'd make sense to my mind; in the past I've owned a couple of Mitsubishis with the twin coolant temperature sensor setup - One fed the ECU and the other was there solely to give a readout to the temperature gauge in the instrument cluster. Seeing as we don't have a temperature gauge, there's no need for the second sensor.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage 3 CVT 1.2 automatic: 47.9 mpg (US) ... 20.4 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.5 mpg (Imp)


  7. #17
    Senior Member Cobrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,127
    Thanks
    1,197
    Thanked 1,849 Times in 1,102 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by flatbroke View Post
    I can't sugar coat this, that's a hack job repair. You go to the dealer, you sit in the lounge and have a cup of coffee and a doughnut while watching ESPN or checking facebook, while a qualified tech does an update on your ECM. Costs you nothing other than a little time and a little gas.Sounds much better than trying to booger an extra coolant sensor into a factory engine harness.
    The reflash may not be an option for people outside the US, and it sounds like the OP is in Europe.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cobrajet For This Useful Post:

    Christopher_B (03-03-2021),cyclopathic (05-19-2016),Eggman (05-19-2016)

  9. #18
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,248
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by flatbroke View Post
    I can't sugar coat this, that's a hack job repair.
    There is no need for sugarcoating - it's not a repair. And I don't recall anyone asking you to do it to your car. However, I am glad for your insights on the pitfalls on these types of modifications. And I must agree - it's one heck of a hack job.




    Quote Originally Posted by foama View Post
    The formula is definitely correct for the total circuit at whatever given temperature.
    You could compare that value with the value of the unmodified circuit, and look it up in the graph what that value means in terms of reported temperature. That is the difference this mod makes.
    You can try it or leave it, I have it working in the Mirage and also in a completely different other car.


    The point is, this mod reduces the enrichment below whatever the ECU would otherwise do.

    Its fine if they reflash your ECU because enrichment is way too much, but thats a different issue.
    foama, here is what I figure the change will do.

    Temp R1 R2 R3 R2+R3 Total ≅℃
    -40℃ 50㏀ 50㏀ 2.5㏀ 52.5㏀ 25.65㏀ -30℃
    -30℃ 28㏀ 28㏀ 2.5㏀ 30.5㏀ 14.6㏀ -20℃
    -20℃ 15㏀ 15㏀ 2.5㏀ 17.5㏀ 8077Ω -10℃
    -10℃ 9㏀ 9㏀ 2.5㏀ 11.5㏀ 5048Ω 5℃
    0℃ 6㏀ 6㏀ 2.5㏀ 8.5㏀ 3517Ω 10℃
    20℃ 2.2㏀ 2.2㏀ 2.5㏀ 4.7㏀ 1499Ω 35℃
    40℃ 1.1㏀ 1.1㏀ 2.5㏀ 3.6㏀ 843Ω 50℃
    60℃ 600Ω 600Ω 2.5㏀ 3.1㏀ 503Ω 65℃
    80℃ 300Ω 300Ω 2.5㏀ 2.8㏀ 271Ω 82℃
    100℃ 170Ω 170Ω 2.5㏀ 2670Ω 160Ω 100℃
    120℃ 100Ω 100Ω 2.5㏀ 2600Ω 96Ω 120℃

    Notes:
    • Since I don't have the actual sensors on hand for testing, all figures are approximate based on interpreting the sample performance chart provided.
    • The calculations took a bit of time (for me) but not too much. I hadn't done such calculating for a while, so it was good to brush up. There were only eleven data points. If anyone cares, I would appreciate someone checking my math!


    If you like, it could be included in the first post rather than be buried at the bottom of the thread.

    Thanks for sharing this clever modification.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eggman For This Useful Post:

    cyclopathic (05-20-2016),foama (05-20-2016)

  11. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mitsu
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,359
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 315 Times in 246 Posts
    Looking at calculations above IMHO it is just easier to block radiator.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 46.4 mpg (US) ... 19.7 km/L ... 5.1 L/100 km ... 55.7 mpg (Imp)


  12. #20
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,248
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 2,826 Times in 2,131 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclopathic View Post
    Looking at calculations above IMHO it is just easier to block radiator.
    That, a engine heater, and this sensor circuit mod. Who will be the first?

    Keep in mind that the value of R3 can be adjusted for different results. I think foama selected a value that produces mild changes without throwing off the operating temperature readings too much. I think his set up is rather clever. He could have gone with a more aggressive value.

    I developed the chart to start that question off - what if we changed R3? Also, what exactly are the real world results of testing the entire setup, rather than guess at it? Put the sensors in a pot of boiling water and measure away.

    P.S.: Don't forget a warm air intake. 3Dplane - what do you think?


    Last edited by Eggman; 05-20-2016 at 07:26 PM.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •