Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: UK: Unflattering... but funny Mirage 3 1.2 review (guardian.co.uk)

  1. #1

    UK: Unflattering... but funny Mirage 3 1.2 review (guardian.co.uk)





    Let's get this part out of the way first: the reviewer did NOT particularly like this car -- the Mirage "3" variant -- which is the top of the line model (ie. the priciest).

    Just about the only things he was able to compliment: the good fuel economy/emissions (meaning, road tax exemption) and the spacious interior.

    And everything else? Sadly, he opines, "the rest is indifferent at best, bad at worst."

    So I won't even bother with the usual pro/con bullet list.

    But I will admit I laughed where he starts out explaining about the car's low drag coefficient, and then concludes with the "dullness coefficient":

    Maybe so much energy went into getting the Cd figure down that they forgot to give it any ID. The dullness coefficient figure – 0.98 – is actually the highest in its class.

    Read it and weep: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...age-car-review


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #2
    Senior Member jamiec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    504
    Garage empty: add car
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 70 Times in 52 Posts
    What a wast of an article that is I don't think he should be doing car reviews.

  3. #3
    I read a few more of his. Yes, he does seem to be going more for the chuckles than imparting a lot of information!


        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •