Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Mirage vs. Spark vs Micra: cheap car overview (Toronto Star Wheels)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Mirage vs. Spark vs Micra: cheap car overview (Toronto Star Wheels)

    Name:  micra-spark-mirage.jpg
Views: 1549
Size:  88.1 KB

    Remember: in Canada, the base versions of these 3 cars (no AC) start under $10k + delivery.

    Except of course Mitsu refuses to lower their MSRP and instead applies an almost perpetual $2500 discount on the base car. Which means when going strictly by MSRP comparisons, it always appears the most expensive. Dumb tactics on the part of Mitsu Canada?

    Name:  mirage-micra-cup-parade.jpg
Views: 1235
Size:  93.2 KB

    Makes me wonder if they've actually driven the 2017 car.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  2. #2
    Where's the leak ma'am? Marklovski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Seattle
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    993
    Thanks
    459
    Thanked 273 Times in 209 Posts
    "front seats are uncomfortable"?

    Lolwut. Front seats better than my 2011 Corolla S.
    Fuel Log: Good enough
    Instagram: @zoras_sapphire

  3. #3
    Moderator inuvik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Coos Bay, OR
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,850
    Thanks
    4,882
    Thanked 1,575 Times in 1,127 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marklovski View Post
    "front seats are uncomfortable"?

    Lolwut. Front seats better than my 2011 Corolla S.
    I agree, front seats aren't bad at all.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 automatic: 40.5 mpg (US) ... 17.2 km/L ... 5.8 L/100 km ... 48.6 mpg (Imp)


  4. #4
    Senior Member Top_Fuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,724
    Thanks
    2,634
    Thanked 2,552 Times in 1,481 Posts
    Were all 3 of these cars comparably equipped (AC, power windows & locks)? If so, is the Mirage really priced $2500 more than these other 2 cars in Canada?

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 52.2 mpg (US) ... 22.2 km/L ... 4.5 L/100 km ... 62.6 mpg (Imp)


  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Top_Fuel View Post
    Were all 3 of these cars comparably equipped (AC, power windows & locks)?
    Of those 3, they're referring to the base models with manual transmissions. In Canada, there's no AC in the base Micra, Spark or Mirage. Micra has manual locks & windows, Mirage has power front windows (but not rears) but no power locks. Not sure about the Spark, but I suspect it has power locks but not windows.

    is the Mirage really priced $2500 more than these other 2 cars in Canada?
    Re the Mirage's MSRP: ever since the Nissan Micra arrived here and stole the entry level show with its sub-$10k pricing, Mitsu Canada has put an almost perpetual $2500 manufacturer's discount on the hood of the base Mirage to make the out-the-door price competitive.

    The problem with that is when auto writers do these "cheap car" articles, they only look at MSRP, so the Mirage loses out by comparison.

    I've seen this happen multpile times and brought it up with Mitsu's PR manager. I didn't get a satisfactory answer about why they don't just lower the MSRP to compete directly.

    When GM introduced the redesigned 2016 Spark, they went with a $9995 MSRP for the base model to compete on price with the Micra. GM undercut the Micra by $3. Nissan actually responded and dropped their price by $10 to regain "cheapest car" status. Mitsu just sits on the sidelines and watches.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:

    Top_Fuel (06-19-2017)

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Marklovski View Post
    "front seats are uncomfortable"?

    Lolwut. Front seats better than my 2011 Corolla S.
    Also: seat comfort is so subjective, reviewers should generally be banned from writing about it.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  8. #7
    Where's the leak ma'am? Marklovski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Seattle
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    993
    Thanks
    459
    Thanked 273 Times in 209 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    Also: seat comfort is so subjective, reviewers should generally be banned from writing about it.
    True, I like the seating position because im tall.
    Fuel Log: Good enough
    Instagram: @zoras_sapphire

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    LA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marklovski View Post
    "front seats are uncomfortable"?

    Lolwut. Front seats better than my 2011 Corolla S.
    I have to agree. I had a 2010 and always had back pain after more than 30 min drive!
    mitsu's in the family

    2024 Mirage SE

    2021 Mirage ES CVT (Sold)
    2021 Outlander Sport 2.0 ES CVT (trade in)
    2018 Mirage G4 1.2 ES CVT (ex wife's car, crashed)
    2017 Mirage G4 1.2 ES CVT Smartphone Link Display Audio (SDA) System(Crashed)
    2015 Lancer SE 2.4 AWC (sold)
    2014 Mirage DE 1.2 Manual and BT (sold)
    2004 Galant DE (mom's sold)
    2000 Mirage DE 1.8 Auto (sold)
    1988 Cordia L Turbo (trade in)

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2017 Mirage G4 ES CVT 1.2 automatic: 42.0 mpg (US) ... 17.9 km/L ... 5.6 L/100 km ... 50.4 mpg (Imp)


  10. #9
    Moderator Eggman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,308
    Thanks
    4,084
    Thanked 2,834 Times in 2,139 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by remusrm View Post
    I have to agree. I had a 2010 and always had back pain after more than 30 min drive!
    2010 was the previous generation Mirage.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 49.6 mpg (US) ... 21.1 km/L ... 4.7 L/100 km ... 59.5 mpg (Imp)


  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Eggman For This Useful Post:

    dragon2knight (05-26-2021)

  12. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    SW, WI
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    7,499
    Thanks
    606
    Thanked 2,731 Times in 2,134 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eggman View Post
    2010 was the previous generation Mirage.
    Think they were referring to a 2010 Corolla & not a Mirage?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •