Originally Posted by
Mark
Those who designed cars like the Matrix & Fit understand why people want small hatchbacks. Mitsubishi designers apparently gave it zero thought. It's probably my 2nd biggest gripe of the car. 1st gripe would be the lame electric power steering. A Mirage would handle better without it.
Mark - I agree with you about most things. And maybe you don't mean this quite as literally as it sounds. Because I can state equivocally, there is so much thought that goes into the development of a vehicle. And I'm sure the Mitsubishi engineers thought, fought, went back and forth, up and down and to and fro about how to develop the rear seats and storage area.
But as with all vehicles, but even more so with inexpensive vehicles, in order to hit a specific target sales price (at least Corporate Division to Sales Division) sacrifices have to be made. And seats are one of the greater expenses of a vehicle. OEMs save A LOT of money by developing inexpensive seats. Same with the EPS. If the next greater EPS motor is $1 more, multiply that times the worldwide sales number of Mirages built, and that is exactly equal to how much more money Mitsubishi profits on sales (again corporate to sales) to use the less expensive EPS motor.
If the Mirage were my only vehicle, the rear hauling / storage might be a concern to me too. However, if it were going to be my only vehicle, I doubt it would be my only vehicle. If I was forced to have 1 vehicle, it would be a 4 banger Tacoma, hopefully with 3 pedals.
__________________________________________
View my fuel log 2020 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 42.4 mpg (US) ... 18.0 km/L ... 5.5 L/100 km ... 51.0 mpg (Imp)