Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Ford to drop mpg on fiesta

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member grsupercity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    817
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts

    Ford to drop mpg on fiesta

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...ered/10383307/


    http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...200-000-owners

    Article says it all! Ford is dropping mpg figures on certain models
    Last edited by grsupercity; 06-12-2014 at 10:29 PM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to grsupercity For This Useful Post:

    Canoehead (06-13-2014),MetroMPG (06-13-2014),Mikhail (06-13-2014)

  3. #2
    Administrator Daox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Germantown, WI
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    4,999
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 1,804 Times in 1,017 Posts
    Yikes, thats a bit of a booboo.
    Custom Mirage products: Cruise control kit, Glove box light, MAF sensor housing, Rear sway bar, Upper grill block

    Current project: DIY Nitrous oxide setup for ~$100

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2015 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 47.2 mpg (US) ... 20.1 km/L ... 5.0 L/100 km ... 56.7 mpg (Imp)


  4. #3
    Senior Member Donut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Country
    Switzerland
    Posts
    234
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 46 Times in 30 Posts
    would be funny if Mitsu also apologized for underrating the Mirage fuel economy.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 47.8 mpg (US) ... 20.3 km/L ... 4.9 L/100 km ... 57.3 mpg (Imp)


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Donut For This Useful Post:

    MetroMPG (06-13-2014)

  6. #4
    Senior Member Alpha_One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Country
    Philippines
    Posts
    261
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 139 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Donut View Post
    would be funny if Mitsu also apologized for underrating the Mirage fuel economy.
    Then American owners would have to compensate them... never mind then.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2012 Mirage GLS 1.2 manual: 33.3 mpg (US) ... 14.1 km/L ... 7.1 L/100 km ... 40.0 mpg (Imp)


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Alpha_One For This Useful Post:

    MetroMPG (06-13-2014)

  8. #5
    Member Yttrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indiana
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 32 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha_One View Post
    Then American owners would have to compensate them... never mind then.
    Hmm....kind of makes me want to send Mitsubishi a check for the underrated MPGs just to see what happens.

  9. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Donut View Post
    would be funny if Mitsu also apologized for underrating the Mirage fuel economy.
    That's too funny.

    I definitely feel Mitsu understated the ratings on the car in the States.

    ---

    As for Ford proactively admitting their "mistake", I'm not willing to be as generous. The EPA has increased its auditing of automakers' mileage claims as a result of earlier problems with Ford and Hyundai's mileage "mistakes" last year. I wouldn't be surprised if Ford realized they were about to get nailed and had no choice but to come clean.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage ES 1.2 manual: 62.4 mpg (US) ... 26.5 km/L ... 3.8 L/100 km ... 74.9 mpg (Imp)


  10. #7
    Senior Member Ares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Houston
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,908
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 201 Times in 142 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
    That's too funny.

    I definitely feel Mitsu understated the ratings on the car in the States.

    ---

    As for Ford proactively admitting their "mistake", I'm not willing to be as generous. The EPA has increased its auditing of automakers' mileage claims as a result of earlier problems with Ford and Hyundai's mileage "mistakes" last year. I suspect Ford realized they were about to get nailed and had no choice but to come clean.
    1. I don't think mitsu understating ratings in the US as I'm getting about the sticker-posted numbers. They just figured that not everyone will hypermill like y'all do.

    2. Ford's doing better at being 'proctive' than Government Motors.

  11. #8
    Senior Member socal6g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ares View Post
    1. I don't think mitsu understating ratings in the US as I'm getting about the sticker-posted numbers. They just figured that not everyone will hypermill like y'all do.

    2. Ford's doing better at being 'proctive' than Government Motors.
    I actually think they have. You for example have wayyyy bigger rims and tires yet you are having the "same" mpg that they have stated on their stock car. Everytime i upgraded rims which was twice and changed the dimensions of the tire. I also was getting around 45-47 mpgs. When I had my stockies I was making easy 52mpgs. Then when I tried to be eco I was closer to 59

  12. #9
    ミラージュ Minihaha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    196
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
    Good for Ford for stepping up and calling themselves out, that's respectable.
    ゼロ

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage DE 1.2 manual: 33.4 mpg (US) ... 14.2 km/L ... 7.0 L/100 km ... 40.1 mpg (Imp)


  13. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Manitoba
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    512
    Thanks
    179
    Thanked 95 Times in 66 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Minihaha View Post
    Good for Ford for stepping up and calling themselves out, that's respectable.
    Agreed. While of course it would be better to have this at the outset - recognizing that a mistake was made and correcting it should also be applauded. I am more concerned about the ratings being comparable across makes/models/trim levels than 100% accurate for real world. If Car A gets 35mpg and Car B gets 37, it should be fact that Car B will do better under identical conditions.

    Sort of reminds me of this truck issue: http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/f...w-ratings.html
    http://www.autonews.com/article/2014...or-tow-ratings
    Where it seems Toyota was the first to step up.

        __________________________________________

        click to view fuel log View my fuel log 2014 Mirage SE 1.2 manual: 45.0 mpg (US) ... 19.1 km/L ... 5.2 L/100 km ... 54.1 mpg (Imp)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •